The review recommends changes to the way PIP is assessed and provided, while keeping the benefit non-means-tested. According to the draft recommendations, cash will remain the foundation of awards, but some support could also be delivered through services and other forms of non-cash assistance.
The concerns centre on whether a future system could treat different groups of disabled people differently, particularly those with conditions that may be harder to assess. Disability Rights UK said the language in the recommendations was unclear and could lead to different interpretations.
Disability Rights UK Highlights Concerns Over Cash Payments and Assessment Changes
Under the proposed approach, support could be divided into different cost categories, including equipment and aids, mobility and transport, and clothing and bedding. Disability Rights UK said this could create uncertainty over whether some people would receive the full value of their award in cash or through alternative forms of support.
The organisation also raised concerns about a proposed “light touch” initial assessment process. It said this could become a tick-box exercise that separates people with different impairments and directs them towards different application routes.
According to Disability Rights UK, there are also unanswered questions about a possible replacement for PIP, including whether any new benefit would apply to existing claimants as well as people making new applications. The group said there had been limited detail about the proposed eligibility framework.
The draft recommendations also include measures aimed at improving the experience of applying for PIP. These include clearer guidance, more respectful communication, improved reasonable adjustments and an advocacy service for people who need assistance with the process.
The review proposes changes to assessments and decision-making, including a new framework for PIP decisions and appeals. It also recommends greater transparency around decisions and a review of how supporting evidence is considered.
Public Support and Campaigners’ Calls for Changes to Disability Benefits
The debate around PIP reform comes as research suggests many people do not support reductions in disability benefit spending. According to the NatCen Social Attitudes Survey, published on 8 September, 49% of respondents said spending on disability benefits should increase even if this resulted in higher taxes. The survey found that 7% supported reducing spending.
Disability Rights UK said the findings should prompt the Government and media to reconsider criticism directed at disabled people and the welfare system. The organisation called for a system that provides financial support and reflects the additional costs faced by disabled people.
Research involving 2,000 PIP recipients found that only 16% believed PIP covered all of their extra costs. Separate research into the Activity Trap found that 80% of disabled people were concerned about being physically active because they feared losing benefits.
The organisation also supports replacing current assessments with personalised support and independent advocacy. It argues that financial assistance should remain linked to the costs disabled people face while living in environments that may not meet their needs.
According to Disability Rights UK campaign and policy officer Sophia Kleanthous, disabled people’s organisations had not been properly included in decisions affecting them during the Timms Review process. The next stage will involve discussions with disabled people, organisations and charities through a series of round-table meetings.
