{"id":124610,"date":"2026-08-23T09:12:28","date_gmt":"2026-08-23T08:12:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/?p=124610"},"modified":"2026-08-23T09:12:31","modified_gmt":"2026-08-23T08:12:31","slug":"stamp-duty-overhaul-extra-home-moves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/stamp-duty-overhaul-extra-home-moves\/","title":{"rendered":"Stamp Duty Overhaul Could Unleash a Wave of 300,000 Extra Home Moves"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Abolishing Stamp Duty Land Tax could increase housing market activity by more than 25%, potentially generating more than 300,000 additional property transactions each year, according to Rathbones<\/strong>. The wealth management firm says the tax discourages some households from moving, even when their homes no longer suit their circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The call comes as speculation continues over possible changes to property taxation ahead of the Autumn Budget. Rathbones argues that policymakers should assess property taxes <\/strong>not only by the revenue they generate, but also by their effects on labour mobility, housing use and economic activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stamp Duty Land Tax is charged on property purchases in England and Northern Ireland above set thresholds. Standard buyers currently pay no tax on the first \u00a3125,000, followed by 2% on the portion between \u00a3125,000 and \u00a3250,000, and 5% on the portion between \u00a3250,000 and \u00a3925,000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Different rules apply to first-time buyers. They pay no Stamp Duty on the first \u00a3300,000 of a qualifying purchase and 5% on the portion up to \u00a3500,000. Buyers who will own more than one property generally face an additional 5% on top of standard rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Rathbones<\/a>, these upfront costs can influence whether people decide to move at all. Jay Lawrence<\/a>, investment director at the firm\u2019s Guildford office, said clients increasingly report remaining in properties <\/strong>that no longer meet their needs because the financial case for moving is weak.<\/p>\n\n\n He said some older homeowners find that the costs of downsizing reduce much of the financial benefit, while younger families can face significant barriers when trying to move into more suitable homes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rathbones\u2019 Building Prosperity report<\/a> cites research suggesting that household mobility could be 27% higher without Stamp Duty. The report says this would be equivalent to more than 300,000 additional home transactions annually. The firm also points to the Australian Capital Territory, where stamp duty reforms were associated with a rise of more than 5% in purchases by first-time buyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Residential property accounts for around 40% of UK household wealth, equivalent to more than \u00a35.5 trillion, according to Rathbones. The firm argues that a more mobile housing <\/a>market could allow some of this wealth to be redirected into investment, business creation, spending or transfers between generations.<\/p>\n\n\n\nStamp Duty Costs May Be Restricting Household Mobility<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Housing Wealth and Affordability Remain Uneven Across England<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n