{"id":122951,"date":"2026-07-14T13:15:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-14T12:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/?p=122951"},"modified":"2026-07-14T12:16:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-14T11:16:14","slug":"property-tax-bombshell-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/property-tax-bombshell-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Property Tax Bombshell: Find Out Whether Your Area Could Pay More"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>More than <strong>21,000 homes in London<\/strong> could face annual property tax bills above<strong> \u00a350,000<\/strong> under a land value tax model linked to proposals supported by Andy Burnham, according to analysis by Tax Policy Associates.<\/p>\n<h2>How the Proposed Tax Would Work<\/h2>\n<p>The model applies an annual charge of <strong>1.28%<\/strong> to the value of the land beneath each property. It would replace both council tax and residential stamp duty. Council tax is currently based on property valuations dating back to 1991, while stamp duty is paid when a home is purchased.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters of reform argue that the present system is outdated and discourages people from moving. The figures are based on a modelling exercise and do not represent confirmed government policy.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_122954\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-122954\" style=\"width: 962px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-122954 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/07\/Screenshot-2026-07-14-123805.jpg\" alt=\"tax\" width=\"972\" height=\"643\" srcset=\"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/07\/Screenshot-2026-07-14-123805.jpg 972w, https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/07\/Screenshot-2026-07-14-123805-380x251.jpg 380w, https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/07\/Screenshot-2026-07-14-123805-520x344.jpg 520w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 972px) 100vw, 972px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-122954\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Andy Burnham. Cr\u00e9dit : Shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>\u00a0<\/h2>\n<h2>London Would Face the Highest Bills<\/h2>\n<p>The largest increases would be concentrated in areas with high land values. More than <strong>15,000 homes<\/strong> in <strong>Kensington and Chelsea<\/strong> could face annual bills above <strong>\u00a350,000<\/strong>. Properties in <strong>Camden, Hackney and Haringey<\/strong> would also be among those paying the highest amounts.<\/p>\n<p>Across the UK, around <strong>576,000 properties<\/strong> could face yearly charges above <strong>\u00a310,000<\/strong>. London households would pay an estimated <strong>\u00a319.6 billion a year,<\/strong> up from <strong>\u00a311.1 billion<\/strong> under the current system. The capital would therefore contribute an extra <strong>\u00a38.5 billion annually. <\/strong>The South East would pay around<strong> \u00a3938 million more.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>Most Homes Would Pay Less<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicy.org.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tax Policy Associates<\/a> estimates that<strong> 69% of homes<\/strong> would receive lower bills, while <strong>31%<\/strong> would pay more. The levy could raise about \u00a356.7 billion a year, replacing <strong>\u00a345.2 billion<\/strong> from council tax and <strong>\u00a311.5 billion<\/strong> from residential stamp duty.<\/p>\n<p>The Treasury would collect roughly the same total amount, but the tax burden would shift towards areas where land is more expensive.<\/p>\n<h2>Bills Could Rise Outside London<\/h2>\n<p>Higher charges would not be limited to the capital. In <strong>Brighton and Hove<\/strong>, a Band D household currently paying<strong> \u00a32,457<\/strong> could face an estimated bill of<strong> \u00a34,267.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In <strong>Bristol,<\/strong> the equivalent charge could rise from <strong>\u00a32,584 to \u00a34,791<\/strong>. Bills could also increase in <strong>Guildford and Waverley<\/strong>. The model assumes the tax would be introduced immediately, without a gradual rollout, caps, exemptions or arrangements to defer payment.<\/p>\n<h2>Homeowners and Renters Could Both Be Affected<\/h2>\n<p>Critics warn that older homeowners with valuable properties but limited incomes could struggle with much higher annual bills. Landlords may also try to pass the cost on to tenants through<a href=\"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/renters-england-rewrites-the-rules-on-pets\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> higher rents<\/a>. Some could choose to sell, reducing the number of homes available in the private rental market.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters argue that replacing stamp duty could lower the upfront cost of moving home and help first-time buyers. A nationwide land valuation system would still be required, creating a complex administrative task and likely disputes over how individual plots are assessed.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\ud83d\udea8 Andy Burnham is facing claims of a \u00a338bn tax raid on the wealthy according to latest analysis<br><br>These changes would fund a big spending spree if he takes over as PM. They include:<br>\ud83d\udd3410% Care Levy on Estates<br>\ud83d\udd34National Insurance on Landlords\u2019 Rental Income<br>\ud83d\udd34Top Income Tax Rate\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/dsWrBETmAa\">pic.twitter.com\/dsWrBETmAa<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Neil McCoy-Ward (@NeilMcCoyWard) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/NeilMcCoyWard\/status\/2076676338212012259?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 13, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A proposed shake-up of property taxes could leave homeowners and renters facing major changes to their annual costs. While many households may pay less, others could see steep rises. Find out which parts of the UK could be hit hardest and why the plan is already sparking debate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":122959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-taxation","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33","no-featured-image-padding"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122951"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122951\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":122958,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122951\/revisions\/122958"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/122959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}