The UK government’s proposed changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) are expected to tighten eligibility criteria, potentially reducing financial support for many claimants.
However, individuals with learning difficulties, cerebral palsy, and autism are reportedly the least likely to be affected, according to the Resolution Foundation.
Under the new assessment system, those scoring fewer than four points in each of the ten PIP evaluation criteria could see their benefits reduced or removed.
This could disproportionately impact individuals currently receiving the Daily Living component of PIP but who do not meet the revised thresholds.
The changes have sparked criticism from MPs and disability advocates, who warn they could push more disabled people into financial hardship.
Tightened Eligibility Criteria Could Reduce Payments for Many
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has proposed modifying the way PIP is assessed, with a focus on ensuring only those with the highest levels of need receive financial support.
According to the Resolution Foundation, the changes will primarily affect those who currently qualify for the Daily Living component of PIP but fail to meet the updated scoring thresholds.
Under the current system, claimants are evaluated across ten key areas, with a score assigned based on their level of need.
The think tank’s analysis suggests that individuals with learning difficulties, cerebral palsy, and autism are among the least likely to be impacted, as they tend to score 21 points or more on the assessment—well above the new threshold. However, others who rely on PIP to cover essential costs may face reductions.
The changes have raised concerns that individuals with invisible disabilities, fluctuating conditions, or mental health issues could be disproportionately affected. Critics argue that reducing financial support for vulnerable individuals may exacerbate poverty and limit independence.
Political and Public Backlash Over Welfare Reforms
The proposed reforms have drawn criticism from politicians across party lines. Neil Duncan-Jordan, MP for Poole, warned that tightening PIP eligibility could plunge more disabled people into poverty, adding that current benefits are already insufficient for many claimants.
Similarly, Terry Jermy, MP for South West Norfolk, expressed disappointment, stating that the new measures would create further difficulties for disabled individuals. He also dismissed the idea that claiming PIP is too easy, sharing his personal experience of helping his father navigate the system after suffering a stroke.
Labour’s leadership has defended the changes, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer arguing that the current system unfairly excludes people with long-term conditions who need better employment support.
However, opposition figures such as Diane Abbott have rejected this rationale, calling the cuts a Treasury-driven effort to balance the budget at the expense of the most vulnerable.
