The acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), Michelle King, has stepped down following a dispute over data access requests from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), according to sources familiar with the matter.
Her resignation, after more than 30 years of service, underscores mounting concerns over the potential misuse of sensitive Social Security recipient information.
The White House has since replaced King with Leland Dudek, a long-serving SSA official, while nominating Frank Bisignano as the agency’s permanent head. The departure of high-ranking officials over data security concerns raises questions about the extent of DOGE’s access to federal databases and its implications for millions of Americans.
Concerns over DOGE’s data access requests
Michelle King reportedly left her role after resisting DOGE’s requests for access to Social Security recipient information, according to sources cited by the Associated Press.
DOGE, an agency working under President Donald Trump’s administration, has been linked to efforts to access Treasury payment systems and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) databases.
Critics argue that such access could pose risks to personal privacy. Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, described the situation as a “serious breach” and warned of its potential consequences.
She emphasised that the SSA holds highly sensitive data on nearly all Americans, including those receiving Medicare and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
“If there is an evil intent to punish perceived enemies, someone could erase your earnings record, making it impossible to collect the Social Security and Medicare benefits you have earned,” Altman stated.
The White House has defended its actions, with spokesperson Harrison Fields asserting that President Trump remains committed to appointing “the best and most qualified individuals” to lead government agencies, rather than catering to bureaucratic resistance.
Political and security implications
The controversy surrounding DOGE’s activities has intensified political debate over data security and government oversight. The administration’s efforts to consolidate control over federal databases have sparked criticism from privacy advocates and lawmakers concerned about the potential for misuse of taxpayer information.
Since President Trump’s return to office, DOGE has reportedly expanded its presence within federal agencies, raising concerns about transparency. Critics argue that the group, which includes billionaire Elon Musk among its key advisers, has operated without public scrutiny, deepening fears of government overreach.
The future of Social Security remains a contentious political issue, particularly after the 2024 election. With over 72.5 million people relying on Social Security benefits, any security breach could have widespread implications.
