{"id":109000,"date":"2026-02-04T09:31:00","date_gmt":"2026-02-03T22:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/?p=109000"},"modified":"2026-02-03T20:18:28","modified_gmt":"2026-02-03T09:18:28","slug":"tga-sounds-alarm-on-sunscreens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/tga-sounds-alarm-on-sunscreens\/","title":{"rendered":"TGA Sounds Alarm on Sunscreens: Two Brands Pulled Over Risk Concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Let\u2019s be honest: most of us don\u2019t pay much attention to sunscreen labels. We see SPF 50+, toss it in the beach bag, and assume we\u2019re covered. But what if the stuff inside that reassuring bottle wasn\u2019t doing what it promised? What if it wasn\u2019t even spreading properly across your skin? That\u2019s exactly what\u2019s behind the latest sunscreen recall shaking up Australian shelves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This week, Edgewell Personal Care Australia announced a recall of Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ and Hawaiian Tropic Mineral Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+. All unexpired batches are affected. And no, it\u2019s not about the SPF level itself being wrong \u2014 this isn\u2019t one of those scandals (though, let\u2019s be real, we\u2019ve seen a few).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The problem is simpler but still serious: some bottles have visible water separation and an uneven, clumpy texture. In normal human terms, it looks weird and spreads badly. And if it spreads badly, it protects badly. Which defeats the entire point of sunscreen, doesn\u2019t it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n