{"id":108397,"date":"2026-01-02T09:31:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-01T22:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/?p=108397"},"modified":"2026-01-01T21:04:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-01T10:04:07","slug":"tax-system-favouring-wealthy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/tax-system-favouring-wealthy\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Australia\u2019s Tax System Is Secretly Favouring the Wealthy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Most Australians pay their taxes and assume the system is fair. But new data tells a very different story. The country\u2019s biggest tax breaks \u2014 from capital gains to superannuation and negative gearing \u2014 are quietly helping the richest Australians grow their wealth faster, while ordinary workers fall further behind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hidden Advantage in Capital Gains<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When an investor sells a property or shares for more than they paid, they make what\u2019s called a capital gain. In theory, that profit should be taxed like income. But under current rules, if the asset has been owned for more than a year, the investor only pays tax on half the profit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This 50% capital gains tax discount means that someone in the top tax bracket, who would normally pay 47% tax, instead pays around 23.5% on their investment income. It\u2019s a massive saving \u2014 and one that doesn\u2019t apply to regular wages, reports News<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Economists have long argued that this policy gives wealthy investors a huge leg up, allowing them to turn assets like property into tax-efficient income streams. Meanwhile, everyday Australians pay full tax on their paychecks, with little chance of accessing similar benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Negative Gearing: A Property Investor\u2019s Bonus<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Then there\u2019s negative gearing, a uniquely Australian tax rule that lets investors claim a loss on their rental property against other income. If your rent doesn\u2019t cover your mortgage and expenses, you can deduct that loss from your taxable income.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In simple terms, it\u2019s a way for high-income earners to lower their tax bill \u2014 while building long-term wealth through property. Around 1.1 million Australians now claim losses from negatively geared properties, but according to the Australian Taxation Office, most of them are in the upper income brackets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critics say the policy fuels property speculation, drives up home prices<\/a>, and keeps younger Australians locked out of the housing market. Supporters argue it encourages investment and keeps rental housing supply alive. Either way, it\u2019s clear that those with money to invest benefit most.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Superannuation: A Tax System Built for the Rich<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Super is supposed to be the great equaliser \u2014 a way for all Australians to retire comfortably. But in practice, the system is far more generous to those who can afford to contribute more. Contributions to super are taxed at just 15%, far below the income tax rates for middle- and high-income earners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A worker earning $180,000 a year can pour large sums into their super at a lower tax rate, saving tens of thousands in the process. Meanwhile, someone on $60,000 simply doesn\u2019t have the spare income to do the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This creates a growing gap over time, where the wealthiest accumulate massive super balances while ordinary workers struggle to reach even the recommended retirement target.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Superannuation balance that puts you in the top 10 per cent of Aussies by age https:\/\/t.co\/tbUsbaKZGf<\/a><\/p>— Yahoo Finance Australia (@YahooFinanceAU) December 30, 2025<\/a><\/blockquote>