{"id":107607,"date":"2025-11-25T09:33:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T22:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/?p=107607"},"modified":"2025-11-24T21:06:29","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T10:06:29","slug":"snapchat-rolls-out-age-verification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/snapchat-rolls-out-age-verification\/","title":{"rendered":"Snapchat Rolls Out Age Verification to Block Under-16s Before Australia\u2019s Big Ban"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>t\u2019s the end of an era for young Aussie Snapchatters. The countdown has begun, and from December 10, thousands of under-16 users will find themselves locked out of their favourite app. The world-first social media ban is coming, and Snapchat, whether it likes it or not, is now on board.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Snapchat Pushes Back \u2014 but Complies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In a move that\u2019s stirred debate among parents, teenagers, and privacy experts alike, Snapchat has confirmed it will start disabling accounts belonging to Australians under the age of 16. The company says it \u201cstrongly disagrees\u201d with its inclusion in the government\u2019s ban, but it\u2019s following the law nonetheless.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Starting this week, the app will begin asking users suspected of being underage to verify their age. Teenagers will need to prove they\u2019re 16 or older using one of three methods: an official photo ID, ConnectID verification through a participating bank, or facial age estimation technology provided by k-ID. Those who can\u2019t verify will be permanently locked out by December 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Snapchat has long maintained that it\u2019s not like the other social media platforms\u2014it sees itself as a private space for messaging, not mass sharing. \u201c<em>Snapchat is and has always been a visual messaging app, primarily used for connection with your closest friends and family<\/em>,\u201d a company spokesperson said to<a href=\"https:\/\/www.9news.com.au\/national\/social-media-ban-kids-snapchat-age-verification\/c75ce4f6-a6c7-4e2a-bd7a-6dc19ab1fcc4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> 9News<\/a>. Still, it admitted that it was \u201cdeeply saddened\u201d that young Australians would lose access to that social connection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Snapchat has just unveiled new age verification measures, to keep under 16s off the platform, just before the upcoming social media ban comes into effect. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ollie_haig?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">@ollie_haig<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/9News?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#9News<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Yk757naM2e\">pic.twitter.com\/Yk757naM2e<\/a><\/p>&mdash; 9News Melbourne (@9NewsMelb) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/9NewsMelb\/status\/1992755651332735332?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">November 24, 2025<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A World-First Crackdown<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The new rules come under the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024, passed last year as part of Australia\u2019s sweeping plan to restrict children\u2019s access to social media. The law classifies certain platforms as age-restricted, meaning under-16s can no longer hold or create accounts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The list of banned platforms reads like a who\u2019s who of teen favourites: Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Reddit, and even Kick. Once the law takes effect, companies that fail to enforce age restrictions could face hefty penalties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While many parents have welcomed the decision as a step toward protecting children from online harms, critics argue the law goes too far. Some digital safety experts warn it could drive younger users toward unregulated or underground platforms, making monitoring even harder. Others have questioned how accurately these platforms can verify age without compromising privacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Happens Next?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>For now, Snapchat\u2019s Australian team is focusing on compliance, not confrontation. The company has promised that accounts belonging to teens who verify their age later \u2014 for instance, once they turn 16 \u2014 will be restored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, Meta (the parent company of Facebook and Instagram) is also preparing to deactivate underage accounts in the coming weeks. Like Snapchat, Meta is developing systems that allow affected users to download their data before accounts are disabled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Whether this ban will set a precedent for other countries remains to be seen. Australia is the first to take such a bold step, but governments worldwide are watching closely. If it works \u2014 or even if it doesn\u2019t \u2014 the outcome could reshape how social media companies handle age verification globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For <a href=\"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/major-platform-joins-social-media-ban\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">young Australians<\/a>, though, the change feels more personal. It\u2019s the end of daily Snap streaks, of quick photos sent to best friends, of that endless scroll before bed. In just a few weeks, the digital world for teens will shrink dramatically \u2014 and for better or worse, there\u2019s no turning back.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Snapchat will begin locking under-16 accounts as Australia enforces its new social media ban, reshaping how teens connect and communicate online.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":107608,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33","no-featured-image-padding"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107607"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107607\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":107609,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107607\/revisions\/107609"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/107608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.econostrum.info\/au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}