ACCC Takes on Meal Delivery Services for Misleading Customers

The ACCC is suing HelloFresh and YouFoodz over “subscription traps,” accusing the meal delivery services of making it difficult for customers to cancel subscriptions.

Published on
Read : 3 min
ACCC Takes on Meal Delivery Services for Misleading Customers
Credit: Shutterstock | en.Econostrum.info - Australia

The convenience of meal delivery services has been a game-changer for many busy Australians, offering everything from fresh ingredients to fully prepared meals at the touch of a button. But recently, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has raised some serious concerns, taking two popular meal delivery services, HelloFresh and YouFoodz, to court over allegedly misleading customers into expensive subscription traps.

The Allegations: What Went Wrong?

The issue centers around a practice that many customers found frustratingly deceptive—being unknowingly locked into a subscription. The ACCC claims that both HelloFresh and YouFoodz led new customers to believe they could easily cancel their subscriptions before the first delivery cut-off time. On paper, this sounded straightforward enough. But when many tried to cancel, they found themselves still charged and receiving deliveries they hadn’t wanted.

The watchdog alleges that despite being able to sign up quickly through the websites and apps, consumers were often required to speak to a customer service representative in order to cancel their subscription. This situation resulted in 62,061 HelloFresh customers and 39,408 YouFoodz customers being charged for a service they had attempted to cancel before the designated cut-off time.

meal delivery
The logo of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

 

Meal Delivery Subscription Traps: A Growing Concern

But the subscription trap goes even deeper. According to the ACCC, HelloFresh required customers to enter payment details just to see the full menu, despite representations during the sign-up process that they wouldn’t be charged unless they selected meals. However, many customers found themselves subscribed and charged anyway—without ever having chosen a meal.

Similarly, YouFoodz allegedly misled customers by suggesting that they could cancel their first delivery online, but then not processing the cancellation as promised. Consumers were told that their cancellation had been processed, only to later find out they were still charged for the first order.

A Widespread Problem

The ACCC is now taking legal action, arguing that both companies engaged in misleading practices, violating Australia’s consumer law. « We allege that HelloFresh and YouFoodz used confusing and unclear subscription practices,» said ACCC Commissioner Luke Woodward to 9News. « Despite what HelloFresh and Youfoodz represented to new Australian subscribers, tens of thousands of consumers were charged for their first order, even though they cancelled their subscription before the cut-off date.»

Why It Matters

This case highlights the growing concern over subscription-based services that make it easy to sign up but hard to cancel. With the rise of subscription models across many industries, from streaming services to meal kits, the ACCC’s actions serve as a timely reminder that businesses must clearly communicate subscription terms and ensure cancellation processes are as easy as signing up.

For consumers, this case underscores the importance of carefully reading all terms and conditions before entering into any subscription agreement. It’s easy to get excited about the convenience of meal kits or streaming services, but without fully understanding the cancellation policies, you might find yourself locked into a contract that’s not as easy to escape as you were led to believe.

The Bigger Picture

The ACCC’s move to take HelloFresh and YouFoodz to court is not just about two companies’ alleged mistakes; it’s part of a broader trend in which Australian regulators are cracking down on misleading business practices that target vulnerable consumers. In a world where digital subscriptions are becoming more common, the case sets an important precedent for how companies must treat their customers, particularly when it comes to transparency and fairness.

As we move into the festive season, when many people will be gifting subscriptions to family and friends, the ACCC is urging consumers to review all contract terms carefully. While the convenience of meal delivery services may be tempting, it’s essential to avoid being caught up in a subscription trap that could leave you feeling frustrated and out of pocket.

Leave a comment

Share to...