Advocates are raising the alarm over potential cuts to the World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP), a critical initiative that has supported more than 140,000 responders and survivors of the September 11 attacks.
These cuts, if implemented, would compromise both existing medical services and future enrolment, endangering the health of thousands who rely on the program for treatment related to 9/11 toxins. Experts warn that unless Congress acts quickly, the situation could worsen dramatically, with deadly consequences for many.
The WTCHP, a vital resource for those exposed to toxic debris at Ground Zero, has provided long-term medical monitoring and treatment since its establishment in 2010. However, its future now hangs in the balance as the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) implements cuts that could reduce staff and limit service availability.
These cuts would have a profound impact on the survivors and first responders who face serious, long-term health issues as a result of their exposure to the toxic environment at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
Financial Strain Threatens Lifesaving Medical Care
The WTCHP, which offers medical treatment for illnesses linked to 9/11 exposure, has served as a lifeline for thousands of first responders and survivors. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the program provides no-cost medical care, monitoring, and essential research on 9/11-related health conditions.
However, cuts to the CDC budget and staffing reductions have already placed a strain on the program. In 2025, the program reduced its staffing from 138 to just 80 employees, which has led to increased wait times and a backlog of patients seeking medical care. For many, delays in diagnosis and treatment could make the difference between life and death.
The budget cuts, which first gained attention during President Trump’s second term, have left many concerned about the program’s future. Michael Barasch, a leading advocate for 9/11 victims, has highlighted that such cuts could significantly delay diagnoses for conditions like cancer, a disease now linked to 9/11 exposure. Without immediate funding increases, the program may not be able to provide timely care for those still suffering from long-term health consequences of the attack.
Bipartisan Efforts Stall Amid Political Deadlock
Bipartisan efforts to address the funding shortfall have so far failed to gain traction in Congress. Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, along with Representative Andrew Garbarino, have introduced legislation aimed at securing the necessary funds, but these bills have stalled. In response to the growing crisis, Gillibrand emphasised the moral obligation to support those who served the nation in its darkest hour, pointing out that Congress had made a promise to provide ongoing care for 9/11 heroes—a promise that now faces serious risk of being broken.
Despite the setbacks, advocates are continuing to push for a resolution, stressing that the program’s survival is not just about healthcare, but about honouring the sacrifices made by responders and survivors who risked their lives for others. As the number of enrollees continues to grow, with over 10,000 new participants in 2024 alone, the urgency for a solution becomes increasingly critical.
