Donald Trump’s first day back in the White House reignited his focus on protectionist trade policies, with hints of bold tariff measures targeting Mexico, Canada, and China. While no immediate actions were taken, the president reaffirmed his intention to prioritise American workers through an aggressive tariff regime.
The announcement marked the start of Trump’s renewed push to reshape international trade agreements. The delay in implementing the tariffs suggests a strategy to minimise market volatility while negotiations with major trading partners remain ongoing.
Trump Hints at Tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China
Trump laid out his plans for a revised trade policy in a number of executive actions he signed on his first day back in office. Proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods are at the heart of his plan, and he said they could go into effect as early as February. These actions are a component of his larger “America First” campaign, which he said aims to rectify decades of unfair trade practices by other countries.
Additionally, Trump highlighted the potential for tariffs on China, linking their implementation to existing debates about TikTok, a Chinese-owned social media platform. Although he declined to elaborate, he made it clear that tariffs may be used as leverage in negotiations with Beijing.
Given the tense past of trade relations between the United States and China, several analysts have voiced doubts about the viability of signing significant agreements with China. Any escalation might result in a protracted trade war between the two economic titans, according to experts.
Legal Framework for Trump’s Trade Strategy
According to reports, the Trump administration is thinking of using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as justification to enact broad trade restrictions. This 1977 law gives the president the authority to declare a state of emergency in response to risks to the economy or national security. The law’s applicability to tariffs, however, is mainly unproven and may encounter serious legal obstacles.
Trump may also use well-established procedures such as Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which offer more traditional means of enforcing tariffs on the basis of trade imbalance or national security. Although these alternatives are less controversial from a legal standpoint, they might take longer to execute and provide less room for forceful action.
Economic analysts have cautioned that Trump’s proposed tariffs may cause market turbulence, which might have repercussions for the US dollar and stock markets. Even the initial postponement has caused varied market reactions, according to a Capitol Economics analysis, indicating that further volatility is anticipated as Trump’s ideas develop.
Trump is paving the way for a new era in U.S. trade policy by fusing legal wrangling with an emphasis on renegotiating trade agreements. It remains to be seen if his strategy improves relations with important allies and trading partners or produces the anticipated economic gains.
Got a reaction? Share your thoughts in the comments
Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to our free Newsletter for captivating articles, exclusive content, and the latest news.
